On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 01:31:05PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:11 PM Lorenzo Stoakes > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 06:02:00PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > Agreed, the mmap_min_addr should stay visible and applied unconditionally. > > > AFAICS the only relation to SECURITY/LSM is whether > > > CONFIG_LSM_MMAP_MIN_ADDR > > > is used as an additional lower limit to both CONFIG_DEFAULT_MMAP_MIN_ADDR > > > and the sysctl-written value? > > > > Thanks, yeah we should probably actually move the non-LSM-relevant stuff > > out to mm to be honest. > > Yes, definitely. Send the LSM and VM lists some patches after the > upcoming merge window closes and I'll make sure they are merged once > fully ACK'd.
Great thank you! Will add to todo. I think that's a sensible thing we can do to help you keep this code sane. > > > But that's future work, for an -rc8 hotfix ... > > Expect a patch later today. Perfect thank you very much! > > -- > paul-moore.com Cheers, Lorenzo
