On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 11:32:42PM +0000, Dag Brattli wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We had a discussion with Linus off the list! I've just made a fix for the stuff
> he didn't like, and I will probably put out a new patch tomorrow.
>  
> -- Dag

        Hi again,

        I did split the huge patch into incremental patches. For my
patches, that was OK, because I kept the archives. The rest was a bit
more painfull. I also did goof up a few times (argh !!!).
        But, the most important part is not so much the split itself,
it is the changelog. Dag, please start to issue ChangeLogs on a
regular basis, that will help us all. I will do that as well.
        See the other e-mail for details...

        An important note : split_irda23.diff is totally new, it was
lying in my tree, so please check that. See changelog for details ;-)
        Also, I did remove the "irnet.diff" file. So this series of
patch is not *exactly* like your big patch.

        For the fix of the change speed uglyness, I would advise you
to send it as an incremental patch to my serie of patches. And with a
Changelog. Just to make sure Linus is happy ;-)

        Now, for 2.2 :
        o IrNET can't work in 2.2.X, so I don't have any incentive
        o The first 5 patches are already in 2.2.15.
        o Of the later patches, a few should not be applied, because
kernels are differents.
        o Somebody should feed them to Alan Cox after proper testing

        Have fun, I'm going to bed...

        Jean
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda

Reply via email to