2006-08-02: Keith Bennett dixit: > [...] > If I may add my 2 pennies worth... > > I think that the entire section should go away. Applications > should not be made aware of the two seperate methods for > accessing the karma. There should be a single > lk_karma_connect() call which takes care of auto-probing the > device (if necessary), and connecting. > > However, this would require an API change, so it should wait > until after the next release.
I don't see what has to be changed from the API point of view. As you say, lk_karma_connect() should be the only function to be called from applications. An we already have it. It's a matter of changing whatever necessary so that it makes all the work and returns -1 if fail, 0 if connected through Ethernet and 1 if USB. What do you think? EV. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
