On Tue, Aug 15, 2006, EV wrote: > 2006-08-15: Keith Bennett dixit: > > The dupes patch was already applied. That's why I sent the > > email suggesting that I resend the tags patch. I will wait for > > your modified error-message patch. > > I have not time now to undo all the work that was included in my > lk005-hg98 patch. If you like, what I can do is to send a patch > **against changeset 96** which includes: > > - your tags-libkarma-hg96.patch > - your libkarma-hg96-dupes.patch > - my error-message mods and other fixes (as in lk005-hg98) > - the fix related with tl_file we've just discussed. > > Should I send it?
My preference is to keep them separate. I find it easier reading through patches when they deal with one specific issue. Not that I always keep to this rule myself, but since they were separate patches to begin with then I would rather that they stayed separate. I'll re-send the tags patch this evening and then all you have to do is diff your current tree with the repository. Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
