On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 12:11:31PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > These cases in mtrr.c are clearly CAP_SYS_RAWIO. > > > > Clearly? How do MTRR changes relate to rawio ? > > RAWIO is about hardware level access not Stephens O_DIRECT stuff So why is /proc/kcore access SYS_RAWIO then ? And why is nvram access not SYS_RAWIO ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Chris Evans
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Richard Gooch
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Chris Evans
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capable/ Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] mtrr: s/suser/capab... Matthew Kirkwood