Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

[Timur Tabi]

** Reply to message from Nathan Paul Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 31
Aug 2000 07:24:28 -0600


> i agree with Alan, and for more than just the above reason.  One of
> the rules of thumb where i work is "keep that sh*t out of our kernel!".  i
> don't see what the problem is with just putting the config file in a common
> place and adding an extension to the end of it, ie
> /boot/config-2.4.0-test1-dbg.

That's why /proc/config.gz should be an option.  People who want it, like
myself, can include it.  People who don't, like you, can omit.

Why can't we have our cake AND eat it too?


-- 
Timur Tabi - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interactive Silicon - http://www.interactivesi.com

When replying to a mailing-list message, please don't cc: me, because then I'll just 
get two copies of the same message.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/