Re: thread group comments

[Ulrich Drepper]

"Andi Kleen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Do you think the SA_NOCLDWAIT/queued exit signal approach makes sense ? 

I'm not sure whether it's worth the effort.  But I'm saying this now
looking at the code for another implementation following the 1:1 model.

In a second stage where we have m kernel threads and n user-level
threads (the ultimate goal) things might be different.  But this is
beyond what is needed in the 2.4 kernel so lets just skip the
SA_NOCLDWAIT stuff for now.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/