Am I right ? against test8pre1
Also, is it a bug to not set TASK_{UN}INTERRUPTIBLE before doing a
schedule_timeout() ? What will happen ?
thanks
john
--- drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c Fri Aug 11 00:21:32 2000
+++ drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c.new Fri Sep 1 02:42:55 2000
@@ -574,6 +574,7 @@
schedule_timeout(HZ);
remove_wait_queue(&socket->wait, &wait);
} while (!signal_pending(current));
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
MOD_DEC_USE_COUNT;
return 0;
}
--- drivers/usb/storage/transport.c Wed Aug 30 18:46:53 2000
+++ drivers/usb/storage/transport.c.new Fri Sep 1 03:14:07 2000
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@
up(&(us->current_urb_sem));
remove_wait_queue(&wqh, &wait);
kfree(dr);
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return status;
}
@@ -472,6 +473,7 @@
/* something went wrong */
up(&(us->current_urb_sem));
remove_wait_queue(&wqh, &wait);
+ set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
return status;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/