> i think it's a quality of implementation issue. The csum_copy_generic > thing is a bug. Allowing incorrect checksums to be sent out would be a > design bug. I think some RFCs do even forbid the sending of incorrect > packets? You are perfectly at liberty to send invalidly checksummed packets. Its a design decision. The remote simply discards the frame Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: zero-copy TCP Alan Cox
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jamie Lokier
- Re: zero-copy TCP dean gaudet
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jes Sorensen
- Re: zero-copy TCP almesber
- Re: zero-copy TCP Ingo Molnar
- Re: zero-copy TCP Andi Kleen
- Re: zero-copy TCP Ingo Molnar
- Re: zero-copy TCP Andi Kleen
- Re: zero-copy TCP Alan Cox
- Re: zero-copy TCP Werner Almesberger
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jes Sorensen
- Re: zero-copy TCP Alan Cox
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jes Sorensen
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jes Sorensen
- Re: zero-copy TCP Alan Cox
- Re: zero-copy TCP Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: zero-copy TCP Alan Cox