Linux is more buggy than NT, but at least the source code comes with it
so there's no excuse for not getting soeone to fix it ....
Jeff
Bob Taylor wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Jeff V. Merkey"
> writes:
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > Jes Sorensen wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Yeah I bet NT also has a wonderful graphical click click wush wush
> > > environment for it that allows you to spend all your time `improving'
> > > your rsi instead of getting real work done. Have you ever looked at NT
> > > device driver code? I have, it's not pretty at all so I can understand
> > > why you need all these tools.
> >
> >
> > The kernel debugger in NT is text based and runs remotely only. It's
> > very powerful and has facilties built in for debugging nested page
> > faults and structured exceptions, SMP deadlocks, conditional
> > breakpoints, and tons of other stuff not in Linux. Since Linux doesn't
> > even support structured exception handling, it's not even a fair
> > comparison between the two.
>
> If NTs debugger is so good then why is NT so buggy? Microsoft
> doesn't know how to use it?
>
> Bob
>
> --
> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Bob Taylor Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> |---------------------------------------------------------------|
> | Like the ad says, at 300 dpi you can tell she's wearing a |
> | swimsuit. At 600 dpi you can tell it's wet. At 1200 dpi you |
> | can tell it's painted on. I suppose at 2400 dpi you can tell |
> | if the paint is giving her a rash. (So says Joshua R. Poulson)|
> +---------------------------------------------------------------+
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
