Re: [patch] string-486.h modified

[Jamie Lokier]

Petko Manolov wrote:
> > You'd still want string-486.h to _call_ the larger routines in
> > string-486.c, using FASTCALL or your choice of alternate registers.
> 
> I am not very sure if Linus will like the idea.

There is precedent: arch/i386/mmx.c.
I expect he'd prefer it over inlining unrolled loops.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/