On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > As readability - it's definitely at least as readable as
> > #if[def]. It also provides more consistent syntax. And when you are
> > using ifdef to violate scoping - your code is in need of rewrite anyway.
>
> You still need the #ifdef stuff as well for half of it so I dont see what
> it buys you
I suspect that it will be way less than half, but there is only one
way to check it... <shrug> I'll try to do it, if it will not give visible
benefits - too bad, I'll waste some time checking the wrong assumption...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 ... Linus Torvalds
- if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 i... Martin MaD Douda
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test... Alexander Viro
- Re: if (CONFIG_FOO) Re: 2.4.0-test... Russell King
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Peter Rival
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Andi Kleen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Mark H. Wood
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about i... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Alan Cox
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Tim Waugh
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about i... Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ho... Pavel Machek
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how ab... Christoph Hellwig

