On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Richard Henderson wrote: >Perhaps. But that's not to say no future compiler won't. I sure agree. That was my original concern w/o looking/knowing how smart the current compiler was infact. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: GCC proposal for "@&q... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber m... Jamie Lokier
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobb... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber m... Juan J. Quintela
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory... kuznet
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber m... Richard Henderson
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobb... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobb... Richard Henderson
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobb... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobb... kuznet
- Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber m... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7 Richard Henderson
- Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7 Andrea Arcangeli