[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Now will you stop trying to incite pointless riots and allow those of us > who are trying to use linux-kernel as a useful means of communicating > development issues a chance for a decent signal to noise ratio? > > -ben Ben, Read the thread before getting out your shotgun and pointing it at me. Rik asked me a question, I answered it. It wasn't related to any code -- if he asks me a question again, I'll answer it. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Availability of kdb Jamie Lokier
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Rik van Riel
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Jamie Lokier
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Rik van Riel
- Re: Availability of kdb Jamie Lokier
- Re: Availability of kdb Rik van Riel
- Re: Availability of kdb kernel
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Val Henson
- Re: Availability of kdb Jamie Lokier
- Re: Availability of kdb Paul Jakma
- Re: Availability of kdb Marco Colombo
- Re: Availability of kdb Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Miles Lane
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Availability of kdb Keith Owens
- Re: Availability of kdb Jeff V. Merkey