On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
>That code example can in theory deadlock without any patches if the CPU's
Woops I really meant:
while (test_and_set_bit(0, &lock));
/* critical section */
mb();
clear_bit(0, &lock);
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preemption patch George Anzinger
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preempti... Andrew Morton
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" preempti... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" pree... Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... George Anzinger
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock" ... Alan Cox
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock&qu... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch]2.4.0-test6 "spinlock&qu... Ralf Baechle

