On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 03:00:29PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Shrug. So you want me to make it worse by shipping unproven code in a way > > I can't test it ? > > > > the code is in 2.4 and has been tested there though. the patches are a > backport of the 2.4 code. ..so it should be at least as well tested as the USB backport in 2.2.18preX, if not more so? Or so is implied. :) -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Distro kernel patches (was Re: Linux 2... Andreas Bombe
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Pedro M. Rodrigues
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Alan Cox
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Paul Jakma
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Jeff Garzik
- Re: Linux 2.2.18pre4 Ed Tomlinson