Alexander Viro wrote: > BTW, any bug reports starting with "kernel is x.y.z + FOO42069 + K314 + > <long list of patches>" will be cheerfully flushed down the toilet here, > no matter what system of dependencies is going to be in place. Yes, for the stuff discussed on lkml patch dependencies should be pretty minimal. However, if I were discussing something on linux-m68k it would be common to say "kernel is 2.5.18 + m68k-native-patch-2.5.18 + mac68k-patch-2.5.18" -Mitch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System Daniel Quinlan
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management Sy... Alexander Viro
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Managemen... Daniel Quinlan
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management Sy... Alexander S A Kjeldaas
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Managemen... Alan Cox
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Manag... Alexander Viro
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch M... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Alexander Viro
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kerne... Russell King
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Manag... Mitchell Blank Jr
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch M... Alan Cox
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch M... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Zygo Blaxell
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch M... Russell King
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Richard Gooch
- Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Pa... Marco Colombo