On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Frederic Magniette wrote: [...] > In that way, I think that a kernel debugger could be a powerful coding > tool and not only a patching tool as you say. I don't have enough background to judge on the merits of a kernel debugger. I simply trust Linus' feelings on the matter. I don't agree with his arguments on (in)natural selection of rabbits (ops, kernel developers, I mean). BTW, a kernel debugger *is* available. And maybe even a more powerful one will be if Jeff decides to port and publicly release it. Many people already use kdb, I think, so why don't you just do the same? .TM. -- ____/ ____/ / / / / Marco Colombo ___/ ___ / / Technical Manager / / / ESI s.r.l. _____/ _____/ _/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- The case for a standard kernel debugger Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger Timur Tabi
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugge... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard kernel deb... Frederic Magniette
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Andrew Morton
- Re: The case for a standard k... Keith Owens
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standard kerne... Marco Colombo
- Re: The case for a standard k... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Andi Kleen
- Re: The case for a standa... Daniel Phillips
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: The case for a standa... Jeff V. Merkey
- RE: The case for a standard kernel debugger Howell, David P
- Re: The case for a standard kernel debugger richardj_moore
- Linux RAS Keith Owens
- Re: Linux RAS Daniel Phillips
- Re: Linux RAS Matt D. Robinson