On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 09:17:51PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > But there may be several p points in the queue, how are you going > to keep track of all of them? With the current elevator there should be only 1 p point, but with the modification Peter suggested there can be more and we should track the one more on the back of the queue. I don't think it's worthwhile. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Rik van Riel
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Peter Osterlund
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm Peter Osterlund
- Re: An elevator algorithm Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: (reiserfs) Re: An elevator algorithm (pa... Jens Axboe
- Re: An elevator algorithm (patch) Marcelo Tosatti