> to see 2.3.1xx like we did with 2.1. But the 2.2.0-testX patches seemed like > small stuff (maybe my memory just sucks tho). I don't think there ever were any 2.2.0-testX patches - my recollection is that we went from 2.1.1xx to 2.2.0-preX, with no -testX in between like we seem to be having now. In other words, if I understand things correctly, once we have Linux 2.4.0-test4294967296 ;) and 2.4 is stable enough for the last phase of testing before release, 2.4.0-pre1 will be next... -Barry K. Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David S. Miller
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David S. Miller
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David S. Miller
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andi Kleen
- Re: networking todo, was Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Barry K. Nathan
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Horst von Brand
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 (version numbering) Barry K. Nathan
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Tom Rini
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 David Ford
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux-2.4.0-test9-pre2 Russell King