Julian Anastasov wrote:
>       I'm talking about test8. __SI_CODE is in 2.4, not in 2.2.
> The handling is very different. We can't wait for si_code==SI_SIGIO
> in 2.4 anymore. SI_SIGIO is used only in 2.2:fs/fcntl.c. 2.4 stores
> POLL_xxx in si_code instead of SI_SIGIO.

Why does it do that?  si_band already stores the POLL_xxx code.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to