Ingo Molnar wrote: > this is fixed in 2.4. The 2.2 RAID code is frozen, and has known > limitations (ie. due to the above RAID1 cannot be used as a swap-device). Eh, just to be clear about this: does this apply to the RAID 0.90 code as commonly patched in by RedHat? Should I instead use a swap file for a machine that should be fault-tolerant against a drive failure? regards, David -- David L. Parsley Network Administrator Roanoke College - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Rik van Riel
- Re: the new VM Christoph Rohland
- Re: the new VM Rik van Riel
- Re: the new VM Christoph Rohland
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: Swap on RAID; was: Re: the new VM parsley
- Re: Swap on RAID; was: Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 Stephen C. Tweedie