On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:42:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > such screwups by checking for NULL and trying to handle it. I suggest to > rather fix those screwups. How do you know which is the minimal amount of RAM that allows you not to be in the screwedup state? We for sure need a kind of counter for the special dynamic structures but I'm not sure if that should account the static stuff as well. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM yodaiken
- Re: the new VM Pavel Machek
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VM yodaiken
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Rik van Riel
- Re: the new VM Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: the new VM Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VM Alan Cox
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Alan Cox
- Re: the new VM Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: the new VMt Ingo Molnar
- Re: the new VMt Andrea Arcangeli