On Wed Sep 27, 2000 at 07:42:00PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > You should of course poll the /proc/meminfo. (/proc/meminfo works in O(1) in > 2.4.x so it's just the overhead of a read syscall) Or sysinfo(2). Same thing... -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Erik Andersen
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar