On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:13:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Can anyone see any problems with the concept of this approach? This can be It works only on top of a filesystem while all the checkpointing clever stuff is done internally by the DB (infact it _needs_ O_SYNC when it works on the fs). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Juan J. Quintela
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks bert hubert
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Miles Lane
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Stephen C. Tweedie
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Alexander Viro
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Ingo Molnar
- Re: [patch] vmfixes-2.4.0-test9-B2 - fixing deadlocks Andrea Arcangeli