> BTW, VA's current kernel-in-testing has Trond's (now your! :-)) NFS, > rock-solid NFSD from Neil Brown and Dave Higgen, and FXSAVE support > back-ported from 2.4. I hope to get much of VA's kernel-in-testing > patch set into mainline 2.2 ... keeping up with N/2 patches is 4x > easier than N. (Or at least it seems so.) If its stable then yes. Minimal FXSAVE in 2.2 may well end up being required as applications start to use SSE and simply assume it works. I'm BTW impressed with the final version of the nfs patches, it was the rants about the old ones that put me off merging it but the latest set has generated 7 emails so far. All positive. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: What is up with Redha... Martin Dalecki
- Re: What is up with Redha... Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redha... Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redha... Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: What is up with Redha... Horst von Brand
- Re: What is up with Redha... Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redha... Mike A. Harris
- Re: What is up with Redha... Michael Meding
- Re: What is up with Redha... Guest section DW
- Re: What is up with Redha... Chip Salzenberg
- Re: What is up with Redha... Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redha... tytso
- Re: What is up with Redh... Lars Marowsky-Bree
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.... Marc Lehmann
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Alan Cox
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.... Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? David Riley
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0? Chris McClellen