On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
I know that you are still pissed at me but do not do end runs around me.
That is not cool, and you do not know where things are going.
Heck, I keep changing my mind on stuff as I design it.
I would be more appreciative if you at least sent it to me since I am the
one that has to clean up issues that I do not get to see.
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > In order for hdparm -d 1 to work in test9-pre8, I had to reverse
> > this change. (Without being able to enable dma, performance here
> > is muy el-stinko;-) Is enabling dma manually now forbidden? (or
> > am I maybe missing something else?)
>
> If this change broke your DMA enabling, I think there are other bugs
> lurking in the code...
No you disable the enable of the device and it kicked out to legacy mode.
> Can you provide a "diff -u " of dmesg, output, with, and without the
> change below?
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Andre Hedrick
The Linux ATA/IDE guy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
