On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Chris Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > Handling out-of-memory in a clean and predictable way is the
> > next thing on the feature list. I'll add it RSN (I'm reasonably
> > sure now that the current VM features are stable ... time for
> > OOM handling).
>
> Stable is good. But before moving on, wouldn't it be nice to
> have some test8 vs. test9 vs. 2.2.14 (or so) benchmarks, to
> confirm it was worth the pain of a whole pre-patch series
> weeding out deadlocks?
Go ahead. I'm interested in the results ;)
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
