Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> > I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
> > new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
> > compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
> > (that was a big problem before, everything ended up on the active list and
> > the swapping started and brought my machine down to a crawl)
>
> No preemptive page-outs?
>
> 0kB swap means if you suddenly need a lot of memory, inactive
> application pages have to be written to disk first.  There are always
> inactive application pages.
>
> Maybe the stats are inaccurate.

Perhaps, but I run most of my machines without swap.  They are between 64 and
256M.  Servers are pretty constant in their mem usage, I use about 75%.   The
workstations sometimes run down to a few megs free (read 'using netscape') and
I then turn on a swapfile.  But all in all they generally do dandy without swap
for days on some, months on others.

-d

--
"The difference between 'involvement' and 'commitment' is like an
eggs-and-ham breakfast: the chicken was 'involved' - the pig was
'committed'."


begin:vcard 
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:<img src="http://www.kalifornia.com/images/paradise.jpg">
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Blue Labs Developer
x-mozilla-cpt:;28256
fn:David Ford
end:vcard

Reply via email to