On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:02:21AM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Looking at the [network] code, I don't see any places where "current"
> > is not valid.
> > Got some examples? 
> 
> Damn I'm being dense tonight.  No, that bug was due to calling "current"
> from the wrong process context, not from an invalid context.
> (Self-flagellate, self-flaggelate).

Don't go overboard here. 
> 
> > BTW: there is an implicit reference to "current"  in smp_processor_id. 
> 
> Yes I forgot about that.  (Self-flagellate).  However that is
> architecture specific.  If it's not an SMP Vax port, no big deal.  If it

The entire concept of an SMP vax port leaves me disoriented.



-- 
---------------------------------------------------------
Victor Yodaiken 
Finite State Machine Labs: The RTLinux Company.
 www.fsmlabs.com  www.rtlinux.com

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to