On Mon, Oct 09 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Torben Mathiasen wrote: > > > > My point exactly. The ordering of driver in drivers/scsi is done now, > > but I don't see a clean way of doing I2O without moving upperlayers > > into a seperate dir. > > Why? > I was referring to Alan's statement about i2o should be the last lowlevel driver before the upper layers. I'm not familar with the i2o code, just thought there was a reason. -- Torben Mathiasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux ThunderLAN maintainer http://tlan.kernel.dk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outsid... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outsid... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside dr... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/scsi Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside drivers/sc... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] Link order of drivers outside driver... Torben Mathiasen