On 9 Oct 2000 11:08:36 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Linus Torvalds) wrote: >Note that there are alternative approaches. For example, you could make >the interrupt stack be in the same multi-page as the regular stack, and >switch them both at task-switch time - just allocate four pages instead >of two, and use "current = esp & ~16383" instead or something like that. Ouch. Too many places in the source have hard coded 8191 or 8192. Would you take a patch to replace all those hard coded numbers with #defines or is that best left for 2.4.1? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Andi Kleen
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Kenn Humborg
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Andi Kleen
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Kenn Humborg
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt con... Andi Kleen
- Re: Calling current() from interrup... Kenn Humborg
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Roman Zippel
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Francis Galiegue
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Linus Torvalds
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Keith Owens
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Kenn Humborg
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt context Alan Cox
- Re: Calling current() from interrupt con... Andi Kleen
- Re: Calling current() from interrup... Alan Cox
- Re: Calling current() from inte... Andi Kleen
- Re: Calling current() from inte... David S. Miller
- Re: Calling current() from inte... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Calling current() from inte... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Calling current() from inte... Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Calling current() from inte... Jeff V. Merkey