> important here (and it could just be a simple configuration error.) > Still, unless I'm mistaken, isn't an 8259A a UART, which should be related > to the serial port? Seems odd it would show up on IRQ 7... 8259A is the interrupt controller on a PC. (A pair of them actually). They raise IRQ 7 if they get a spurious interrupt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler Matthew Dharm
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler lamont
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler Byron Stanoszek
- spurious 8259A interrupt? Daniel Lange
- Re: spurious 8259A interrupt? Alan Cox
- Re: spurious 8259A interrupt? Richard B. Johnson
- Re: spurious 8259A interrupt? Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler lamont
- Re: [RFC] New ideas for the OOM handler David Feuer