On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 02:08:45PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am one of those people that uses PCMCIA on an SMP machine, I also > use 2.4. Aside from the very occasional problem, I don't see any > locking issues. Is it possible to just leave it as is with a warning? I think the configuration should still permit it; the probability of hitting the locking issue in the ds module is vanishingly small. The problem of non-SMP-tested PCMCIA drivers is more serious, but I'd really call all the 2.4 PCMCIA code "experimental" at this point. -- Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [BUG?] AMD 5x86 and 2.4 (w... Vojtech Pavlik
- Re: [BUG?] AMD 5x86 and 2.4 (w... Andreas Eibach
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List tytso
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Jens Axboe
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Guest section DW
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Shane Shrybman
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Andrew Morton
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List David Hinds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List mmangino
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List David Hinds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List Rik van Riel
- 2.4.0test9 vm: disappointing streaming i/o unde... Chris Evans
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List tytso
- [RFC] atomic pte updates for x86 smp Ben LaHaise
- Re: [RFC] atomic pte updates for x86 sm... Linus Torvalds
- Re: [RFC] atomic pte updates for x8... Benjamin C.R. LaHaise
- Re: [RFC] atomic pte updates f... David S. Miller
- Re: [RFC] atomic pte updat... Cort Dougan
- Re: [RFC] atomic pte updat... Benjamin C.R. LaHaise