On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Bruce A. Locke wrote: > I wasn't aware PAM settings affected daemons started up during boottime > but I will check into it, thank you. > daemons generally don't need to be PAM aware (unless they deal with authorising things). The script that launches it however (if started by a PAM aware app such as su) can set limits - which the daemon should inherit. > BTW, you said it works only 90%, what are the other 10% of times it > doesn't work? > malicious processes, or a collection of processes. --paulj - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix fo... Bruce A. Locke
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fi... Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] V... Bruce A. Locke
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATC... Paul Jakma
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fi... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] V... Bruce A. Locke
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATC... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] V... Andrew Pimlott
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATC... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: ... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix fo... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix fo... lamont
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fi... Matthew Hawkins
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [PATCH] VM fix fo... Jesse Pollard