> > In truth I think 2.95 is now at the point where if anything kernel side is > > broken it must be fairly obscure or a little used driver > > I've been using 2.95.2 to build PPC kernels and it seems to work > OK, but I _know_ that 2.91.66 works with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels so it should > probably be the recommended one. :) The rules for non x86 platforms tend to be different. It may be 2.95 is the PPC recommended compiler even > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Petri Kaukasoina
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Eric Lowe
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Igmar Palsenberg
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Michael Meding
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Andre Tomt
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Alan Cox
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Chmouel Boudjnah
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions J . A . Magallon
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Harald Welte
- Re: Kernel 2.2.18 and GCC versions Johan Kullstam