On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Shane Shrybman wrote:
> I applied these changes to 2.4.0-test10-pre3 and I got these messages in
> the system log:
> 
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: __alloc_pages: 5-order allocation failed.
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: eth0: Memory squeeze, dropping packet.
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: __alloc_pages: 5-order allocation failed.
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: eth0: Memory squeeze, dropping packet.
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: __alloc_pages: 5-order allocation failed.
> Oct 15 11:24:05 mars kernel: eth0: Memory squeeze, dropping packet.
> 
> And then a spontaneous reboot. :(   Which is what I have been
> seeing with this driver for a while.

What happens if you try the following patch instead?  The original
out-of-memory behaviour seems a bit bogus to me. This patch is untested,
but should work.

(After looking at the specification for the 8139, I am acctually ashamed
of having bough one. How they could leave out a description of the receive
ring buffer in the spec is truly amazing. I wonder if the status=0 case I 
encoutered was just a case of getting lost in the ring buffer.)

/Tobias

--- 8139too.c.orig      Sun Oct 15 01:49:47 2000
+++ 8139too.c   Sun Oct 15 22:23:34 2000
@@ -1736,8 +1736,11 @@
                /* if Rx err received, Rx process gets reset, so
                 * we abort any further Rx processing
                 */
-               if (rx_status &
-                   (RxBadSymbol | RxRunt | RxTooLong | RxCRCErr | RxBadAlign)) {
+               if (pkt_size < 0 || !(rx_status & RxStatusOK)) {
+                       if (pkt_size < 0)
+                               printk (KERN_WARNING
+                                       "%s: Negative packet size received (%04x).\n",
+                                       dev->name, pkt_size);
                        rtl8139_rx_err (rx_status, dev, tp, ioaddr);
                        return;
                }
@@ -1752,23 +1755,23 @@
                 */
 
                skb = dev_alloc_skb (pkt_size + 2);
-               if (skb == NULL) {
+               if (skb) {
+                       skb->dev = dev;
+                       skb_reserve (skb, 2);   /* 16 byte align the IP fields. */
+
+                       eth_copy_and_sum (skb, &rx_ring[ring_offset + 4], pkt_size, 0);
+                       skb_put (skb, pkt_size);
+
+                       skb->protocol = eth_type_trans (skb, dev);
+                       netif_rx (skb);
+                       tp->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_size;
+                       tp->stats.rx_packets++;
+               } else {
                        printk (KERN_WARNING
                                "%s: Memory squeeze, dropping packet.\n",
                                dev->name);
                        tp->stats.rx_dropped++;
-                       break;
                }
-               skb->dev = dev;
-               skb_reserve (skb, 2);   /* 16 byte align the IP fields. */
-
-               eth_copy_and_sum (skb, &rx_ring[ring_offset + 4], pkt_size, 0);
-               skb_put (skb, pkt_size);
-
-               skb->protocol = eth_type_trans (skb, dev);
-               netif_rx (skb);
-               tp->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_size;
-               tp->stats.rx_packets++;
 
                cur_rx = (cur_rx + rx_size + 4 + 3) & ~3;
                RTL_W16_F (RxBufPtr, cur_rx - 16);

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to