Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen)
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Cox) wrote on 09.10.00 in
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > I do use PINE, and I still think QP is buggy and a stupid excersize. Mail
> > > delivery should have been cleaned up, not the user agent. You could have
> > > done the equivalent of QP inside sendmail, and none of the stupid QP
> > > issues would ever ever have happened (sure, people with old sendmails
> > > would have seen the QP-encoding, but that's THEIR problem).
> >
> > Umm you can. Sendmail supports arbitary delivery agents, you just need to
> > write a suitable one in your 'copious' free time
>
> Such software exists. Stuff like emil, for example ...
>
In the case of sendmail, just add F=9 to the appropriate delivery
agent.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
