Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 09:07:57 -0600 From: Matt Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hence, the JVM fails compatibility on Linux 2.4. Due ot this and other reasons I'm restoring the 2.2.x behavior by default, but adding a sysctl so that systems using dynamic addressing may elect to get the different bind() behavior. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alberto Bertogli
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Horst von Brand
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Jamie Lokier
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses H. Peter Anvin
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local address... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Felix von Leitner
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Christoph Hellwig
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local ad... David S. Miller