On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:45:02AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > To this I agree, but I cannot change the fact that this assumption > does exist in applications, so this is why I reverted the change. Would you accept a patch for an setsockopt to enable it again ? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Felix von Leitner
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Hellwig
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David S. Miller
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Andi Kleen
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Woodhouse
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Eric Lammerts
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Matt Peterson
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alexander Viro
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Alan Cox
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz
- Re: bind() allowed to non-local addresses Christoph Rohland
- RE: bind() allowed to non-local addresses David Schwartz