Jim Gettys wrote: > So I want an interface in which I can get as many events as possible > at once, and one in which the events themselves can have appropriate > aggregation behavior. It isn't quite clear to me if the proposed interface > would have this property. I believe get_event, /dev/poll, and kqueue all share this property. e.g. none of them will present multiple POLLIN events per fd per call. Is that what you meant? - Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Simon Kirby
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Jim Gettys
- RE: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- RE: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Chris Swiedler
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Edgar Toernig
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sc... Dan Kegel
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sc... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() no... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not sc... Mark Montague
- Re: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? Nick Piggin
- RE: Linux's implementation of poll() not scalable? David Schwartz