On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 18:41 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 20 October 2015 at 11:13, Chaotian Jing <chaotian.j...@mediatek.com> wrote: > > Change in v2: > > Drop the 400mhz and use assigned-clock-parents to instead > > Split the original tune patch to several independent patches > > Re-write the mmc_send_tuning() > > Fix GPD checksum error > > Move the HS400 setting to ops->prepare_hs400_tuning() > > Modify SD driving settings > > > > Change in v1: > > Add DT bindings for eMMC hardware reset > > Add pinctrl of data strobe pin for HS400 mode > > Modify eMMC driving settings > > Add 400mhz source clock for HS400 mode > > Add eMMC HS200/HS400 mode support > > Add SD SDR50/SDR104 mode support > > Add implement of tune function with CMD19/CMD21 > > > > Chaotian Jing (9): > > mmc: core: Add DT bindings for eMMC hardware reset support > > mmc: dt-bindings: update Mediatek MMC bindings > > mmc: mediatek: make cmd_ints_mask to const > > mmc: mediatek: change the argument "ddr" to "timing" > > mmc: mediatek: fix got GPD checksum error interrupt when data transfer > > mmc: mediatek: add implement of ops->hw_reset() > > mmc: mmc: extend the mmc_send_tuning() > > mmc: mediatek: add HS400 support > > arm64: dts: mediatek: add HS200/HS400/SDR50/SDR104 support > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 1 + > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mtk-sd.txt | 11 +- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-evb.dts | 27 ++- > > drivers/mmc/core/host.c | 2 + > > drivers/mmc/core/mmc_ops.c | 8 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 4 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 2 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.h | 2 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 296 > > ++++++++++++++++++++--- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 6 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 2 +- > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-sirf.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/mmc/core.h | 2 +- > > 13 files changed, 314 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 1.8.1.1.dirty > > I have reviewed the patches, I think they overall looks good! Some > comments though. > > You need to split patch 9, the DT parts enabling hw reset shall go in > separately. > Ok, will separate it at next revision.
> Regarding the hw-reset changes in patch1, patch6 and patch9, I believe > I requested you to separate the HW reset changes from $subject > patchset as they are unrelated, please do this. > As you know, the hw-reset is a part of mmc retune. so that I add it to this series. > Running checkpatch, it gave me warnings and errors for patch 8. > Patch7 didn't apply to my next branch. > I will fix the checkpatch warnings and errors at next revision. by the way, I tried to use "git am 0007-mmc-mmc-extend-the-mmc_send_tuning.patch" in your branch, there was no conflict, so why couldn't apply it ? Thx! > Kind regards > Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
