Hi,

On 22-10-15 09:58, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 21:18:45 +0200
Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:

Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I
ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan 
<rein...@mveas.com>
(added to the Cc).

We took a slightly different approach for the gates clocks, see:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commits/sunxi-wip

And specifically:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/80a1afe319d5d1a0c426d42e75d37f0c64e8ea0b

Combined with:

https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/d508da5feb5048f6674d6b24b58ac9058fb9d877

This deals with the per gate parents the same way the rockchip
clock code does, and it seems to be quite a bit less code then your solution.

Here is a simpler patch:

diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c 
b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
index 6ce9118..8fecaeab 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-simple-gates.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct 
device_node *node,
        void __iomem *reg;
        const __be32 *p;
        int number, i = 0, j;
+       bool parent_per_gate;
        u8 clk_bit;
        u32 index;

@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct 
device_node *node,
                return;

        clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
+       parent_per_gate = of_clk_get_parent_count(node) != 1;

        clk_data = kmalloc(sizeof(struct clk_onecell_data), GFP_KERNEL);
        if (!clk_data)
@@ -58,6 +60,8 @@ static void __init sunxi_simple_gates_setup(struct 
device_node *node,
        of_property_for_each_u32(node, "clock-indices", prop, p, index) {
                of_property_read_string_index(node, "clock-output-names",
                                              i, &clk_name);
+               if (parent_per_gate)
+                       clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, i);

                clk_reg = reg + 4 * (index / 32);
                clk_bit = index % 32;



Yes good one, doing things that way indeed is better.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to