On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 11:23:26AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > > > + if (cnt_hmm_entry) {
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = hmm_mm_fork(src_mm, dst_mm, dst_vma,
> > > > + dst_pmd, start, end);
> > >
> > > Given start, s/end/addr/, no?
> >
> > No, end is the right upper limit here.
> >
> Then in the first loop, hmm_mm_fork is invoked for
> the _entire_ range, from input addr to end.
> In subsequent loops(if necessary), start is updated to
> addr, and hmm_mm_fork is also invoked for remaining
> range, from start to end.
>
> Is the above overlap in range making sense?
Well yes and no, hmm_mm_fork() will do nothing for address >= addr
i feel like end is easier to understand.
Cheers,
Jérôme
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
