On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 09:08:56PM +0000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
Hi Tigran,
> I have only now had time to read your patch and reject most of it --- the
> email addresses in the revision histories etc are for historical purposes
> and as such are very useful. They are NOT meant to be valid except at the
> moment of time when they are written. The only purpose of email address in
> the revision history is the indication where the person worked _at the
> time_.
as I explained with my email address as an example, email addresses
aren't suitable for this.
> The only bits that should be made sure to remain valid are the
> MODULE_AUTHOR, as Arjan also mentioned.
Even the "please contact the author" and the printk() should continue to
contain known bouncing addresses?
> Also, it is very strange that I have _not_ received your original email
> containing the patch --- I only saw it now via lkml archive.
I haven't yet gotten a bounce from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you have a spamfilter?
Or a provider doing some kind of email filtering?
> Kind regards
> Tigran
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
