> > It comes down to just what those guarantees GCC provides actually are.
> This is the first correct statement in your email. In any case the > documented GCC guarantees have always been much stronger than you > have been trying to persuade us they should be. I would argue that > the C standard somewhat indirectly specifies those guarantees but I > really don't have the heart for any more language-lawyering so I'm > going to leave it at that. I have tried to find any documentation of the guarantees gcc actually provides and have been unable to do so. Where are these "documented GCC guarantees" documented? DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
