On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Anyone south of Wolfram and north of the I2C ML is unlikely to care. > > Actually, driver maintainers should care about their portion of it. > Which leads me to the conclusion that driver maintainer entries in > MAINTAINERS should have the relevant Kconfig symbol as a keyword match, > probably.
Good point, well put. Although this situation is fairly unique to Kconfig changes. In general I know I don't want to be spammed with changes to all the files I've ever adapted though. If people wish to act as reviewers, they should have a mention in MAINTAINERS for get_maintiner.pl to pull information from: R: Designated reviewer: FullName <address@domain> These reviewers should be CCed on patches. Or a new marker, I: Interested parties. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
