>From what I can tell there were several errors in the sriov_enable
exception handling path.  Below is a brief list of what I believe I am
fixing:

1.  If pcibios_enable_sriov failed, we returned without disabling SR-IOV on
    the device.
2.  If virtfn_add failed we didn't call pcibios_disable_sriov to undo
    pcibios_enable_sriov.
3.  We were resetting numvfs to 0 before a second had passed for the VFs to
    quiesce.
4.  Minor coding style issues for white space and for assignment in
    conditional check.

Beyond addressing these 4 issues there were also 2 other minor issues in
that retval was a redundant variable with rc, and j wasn't actually needed
as we could simply reverse the loop we were running when setting up i.  As
such I have updated the code to address those two items.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <adu...@mirantis.com>
---
 drivers/pci/iov.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/iov.c b/drivers/pci/iov.c
index 238950412de0..cecc242c1af0 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/iov.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/iov.c
@@ -231,13 +231,18 @@ static void virtfn_remove(struct pci_dev *dev, int id, 
int reset)
 
 int __weak pcibios_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
 {
-       return 0;
+       return 0;
+}
+
+int __weak pcibios_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+       return 0;
 }
 
 static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
 {
        int rc;
-       int i, j;
+       int i;
        int nres;
        u16 offset, stride, initial;
        struct resource *res;
@@ -245,7 +250,6 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int nr_virtfn)
        struct pci_sriov *iov = dev->sriov;
        int bars = 0;
        int bus;
-       int retval;
 
        if (!nr_virtfn)
                return 0;
@@ -322,10 +326,11 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int 
nr_virtfn)
        if (nr_virtfn < initial)
                initial = nr_virtfn;
 
-       if ((retval = pcibios_sriov_enable(dev, initial))) {
+       rc = pcibios_sriov_enable(dev, initial);
+       if (rc) {
                dev_err(&dev->dev, "failure %d from pcibios_sriov_enable()\n",
-                       retval);
-               return retval;
+                       rc);
+               goto err_pcibios;
        }
 
        for (i = 0; i < initial; i++) {
@@ -340,25 +345,23 @@ static int sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *dev, int 
nr_virtfn)
        return 0;
 
 failed:
-       for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
-               virtfn_remove(dev, j, 0);
+       while (i--)
+               virtfn_remove(dev, i, 0);
 
+       pcibios_sriov_disable(dev);
+err_pcibios:
        iov->ctrl &= ~(PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_VFE | PCI_SRIOV_CTRL_MSE);
        pci_cfg_access_lock(dev);
        pci_write_config_word(dev, iov->pos + PCI_SRIOV_CTRL, iov->ctrl);
-       pci_iov_set_numvfs(dev, 0);
        ssleep(1);
        pci_cfg_access_unlock(dev);
 
        if (iov->link != dev->devfn)
                sysfs_remove_link(&dev->dev.kobj, "dep_link");
 
-       return rc;
-}
+       pci_iov_set_numvfs(dev, 0);
 
-int __weak pcibios_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
-{
-       return 0;
+       return rc;
 }
 
 static void sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to