On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > w1_process() calls try_to_freeze(), but the thread doesn't mark itself > > freezable through set_freezable(), so the try_to_freeze() call is useless. > > I believe it is better to mark it freezable, what do you think? Its task > is useless if anyone else goes sleeping, it should freeze too.
I fail to see why this kthread should be freezable at all. There is no way for w1 device to generate new I/O requests that should be written out to filesystem, is it? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/