> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Norris [mailto:computersforpe...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 28 October 2015 05:45
> To: Anup Patel
> Cc: David Woodhouse; Linux MTD; Rob Herring; Pawel Moll; Mark Rutland;
> Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; Sudeep Holla; Ian Campbell; Kumar Gala; Ray Jui;
> Scott Branden; Florian Fainelli; Pramod Kumar; Vikram Prakash; Sandeep
> Tripathy; Linux ARM Kernel; Device Tree; Linux Kernel;
> bcm-kernel-feedback-list
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Force 8bit mode before doing
> nand_scan_ident()
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 10:46:12AM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > Just like other NAND controllers, the NAND READID command only works
> > in 8bit mode for all versions of BRCMNAND controller.
> >
> > This patch forces 8bit mode for each NAND CS in brcmnand_init_cs()
> > before doing nand_scan_ident() to ensure that BRCMNAND controller is
> > in 8bit mode when NAND READID command is issued.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <r...@broadcom.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <sbran...@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 9 +++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > index 4cba03d..0be8ef9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > @@ -1888,6 +1888,7 @@ static int brcmnand_init_cs(struct brcmnand_host
> *host)
> > struct mtd_info *mtd;
> > struct nand_chip *chip;
> > int ret;
> > + u16 cfg_offs;
> > struct mtd_part_parser_data ppdata = { .of_node = dn };
> >
> > ret = of_property_read_u32(dn, "reg", &host->cs); @@ -1930,6
> > +1931,14 @@ static int brcmnand_init_cs(struct brcmnand_host *host)
> >
> > chip->controller = &ctrl->controller;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * The bootloader might have configured 16bit mode but
> > + * NAND READID command only works in 8bit mode. We force
> > + * 8bit mode here to ensure that NAND READID commands works.
> > + */
> > + cfg_offs = brcmnand_cs_offset(ctrl, host->cs, BRCMNAND_CS_CFG);
> > + nand_writereg(ctrl, cfg_offs, nand_readreg(ctrl, cfg_offs) &
> > +~BIT(23));
>
> Can we get a new enum for cfg bits? Unfortunately, I never managed that in
> brcmnand_set_cfg(); just magic numbers :( But I'd like to stop that if we're
> going
> to have to touch these bits outside of brcmnand_set_cfg().
Even I felt the need to have enum for cfg bits, just like other parts of the
BRCM NAND driver.
>
> > +
> > if (nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, NULL))
> > return -ENXIO;
> >
>
> How about the following, as a preparatory patch? Only compile tested.
>
> From c5423a86dbfa33b550d2b170bda3c12ecf4d5313 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> 2001
> From: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:12:13 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] mtd: brcmnand: factor out CFG and CFG_EXT bitfields
>
> These used magic numbers. Shame on me.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpe...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Anup Patel <anup.pa...@broadcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c | 38
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> index d694d876631e..c93fbc3869ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> @@ -344,6 +344,28 @@ static const u8 brcmnand_cs_offsets_cs0[] = {
> [BRCMNAND_CS_TIMING2] = 0x14,
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Bitfields for the CFG and CFG_EXT registers. Pre-v7.1 controllers
> +only had
> + * one config register, but once the bitfields overflowed, newer
> +controllers
> + * (v7.1 and newer) added a CFG_EXT register and shuffled a few fields
> around.
> + */
> +enum {
> + CFG_BLK_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT = 8,
> + CFG_COL_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT = 12,
> + CFG_FUL_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT = 16,
> + CFG_BUS_WIDTH_SHIFT = 23,
> + CFG_BUS_WIDTH =
> BIT(CFG_BUS_WIDTH_SHIFT),
> + CFG_DEVICE_SIZE_SHIFT = 24,
> +
> + /* Only for pre-v7.1 (with no CFG_EXT register) */
> + CFG_PAGE_SIZE_SHIFT = 20,
> + CFG_BLK_SIZE_SHIFT = 28,
> +
> + /* Only for v7.1+ (with CFG_EXT register) */
> + CFG_EXT_PAGE_SIZE_SHIFT = 0,
> + CFG_EXT_BLK_SIZE_SHIFT = 4,
> +};
> +
> /* BRCMNAND_INTFC_STATUS */
> enum {
> INTFC_FLASH_STATUS = GENMASK(7, 0),
> @@ -1710,17 +1732,19 @@ static int brcmnand_set_cfg(struct brcmnand_host
> *host,
> }
> device_size = fls64(cfg->device_size) -
> fls64(BRCMNAND_MIN_DEVSIZE);
>
> - tmp = (cfg->blk_adr_bytes << 8) |
> - (cfg->col_adr_bytes << 12) |
> - (cfg->ful_adr_bytes << 16) |
> - (!!(cfg->device_width == 16) << 23) |
> - (device_size << 24);
> + tmp = (cfg->blk_adr_bytes << CFG_BLK_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT) |
> + (cfg->col_adr_bytes << CFG_BLK_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT) |
> + (cfg->ful_adr_bytes << CFG_FUL_ADR_BYTES_SHIFT) |
> + (!!(cfg->device_width == 16) << CFG_BUS_WIDTH_SHIFT) |
> + (device_size << CFG_DEVICE_SIZE_SHIFT);
> if (cfg_offs == cfg_ext_offs) {
> - tmp |= (page_size << 20) | (block_size << 28);
> + tmp |= (page_size << CFG_PAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> + (block_size << CFG_BLK_SIZE_SHIFT);
> nand_writereg(ctrl, cfg_offs, tmp);
> } else {
> nand_writereg(ctrl, cfg_offs, tmp);
> - tmp = page_size | (block_size << 4);
> + tmp = (page_size << CFG_EXT_PAGE_SIZE_SHIFT) |
> + (block_size << CFG_EXT_BLK_SIZE_SHIFT);
> nand_writereg(ctrl, cfg_ext_offs, tmp);
> }
Your patch looks good to me. I will base this patch upon your
patch and test it at my end.
I will send a revised patchset which will include your patch (preserving
your authorship) and tested on NS2 SVK.
Thanks,
Anup
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
